ITEA vs. ISTE Standards

Our next speaker, Dr. William Dugger, is going to present about technology standards. Wow, I'm so excited about this because I actually did a policy analysis on standards in 2006. Now things have changed but the fact that there is confusion about techology standards is not a surprise to me.

He brings to our attention the ITEA Gallup poll where Americans tell us that technology is COMPUTERS and INTERNET. Now that is correct but reflects a very narrow view of what technology is. The definition I always used with my 6th graders was 'technology is the study of machines and tools' - it's simple but it lacks the emphasis on process. To quote our speaker, "Technology solves problems but it also creates problems." It is not just our innovations of our technology but the impact and the design of the technology that is truly lacking in many of our technology in education efforts.

There are so many types of technology literacy - and they are not equivalent with technological competency. I think too often teachers are focusing on competency and missing the literacy component.

Btw, I am now going to have to attach my paper and powerpoint on that but I can't do so through mobile blog (note to self).

ITEA standards actually focus instruction on how technologies are engineered and how they affect and impact society and the environment.

So Julz and I sidebar about how this is achieved. Students don't just work within the network, they play a role in the construction and administration of the network. Students don't just use a tool, they evaluate the usability of the tool and the impact of said tool on themselves and their envirionment. Where does this 'student as programmer' role originate? In my mind, it's from Seymour Papert. But these constructionist roots came log ago, and for the large part are still missing in our classrooms. Aside from innovations such as ThinkQuest and SuperComputing Challenge (which only a few kids actually do) the student as programmer role is missing - ESPECIALLY as accessed by low-socio-economic categorized students.

If students are programmers, does that mean they all have to know programming languages? Not necessarily. I would argue that Web 2.0 is the perfect launchpad for this student as designer and programmer role.

So as Julz and I talk about our Standards project (incorporating the best of online teaching and learning standards) we must now devise the Pedagogies of Web 2.0 standards....and you can bet your bottom dollar we will focus our attention on the true technology literacies - the abilities of students to design, evaluate, and improve technologies for self-development and improvement of society. Our kids need to be prepared to evaluate the safeness of technology as they are sure to live in a time where change is certain....if they're not able to decide for themselves what is healthy and safe, who will decide for them?